MUÑASQUE v. CA
G.R. No. L-39780;
November 11, 1985
Ponente: J. Gutierrez.
Jr
FACTS:
Elmo
Muñasque filed a complaint for payment of sum of money and damages against
respondents Celestino Galan, Tropical Commercial, Co., Inc. (Tropical) and
Ramon Pons, alleging that the petitioner entered into a contract with
respondent Tropical through its Cebu Branch Manager Pons for remodeling a
portion of its building without exchanging or expecting any consideration from
Galan although the latter was casually named as partner in the contract; that
by virtue of his having introduced the petitioner to the employing company
(Tropical), Galan would receive some kind of compensation in the form of some
percentages or commission.
Tropical
agreed to give petitioner the amount of P7,000.00 soon after the construction
began and thereafter the amount of P6,000.00 every fifteen (15) days during the
construction to make a total sum of P25,000.00.
On
January 9, 1967, Tropical and/or Pons delivered a check for P7,000.00 not to
the plaintiff but to a stranger to the contract, Galan, who succeeded in
getting petitioner's indorsement on the same check persuading the latter that
the same be deposited in a joint account.
On January 26, 1967, when the second check for
P6,000.00 was due, petitioner refused to indorse said check presented to him by
Galan but through later manipulations, respondent Pons succeeded in changing
the payee's name to Galan and Associates, thus enabling Galan to cash the same
at the Cebu Branch of the Philippine Commercial and Industrial Bank (PCIB)
placing the petitioner in great financial difficulty in his construction
business and subjecting him to demands of creditors to pay for construction
materials, the payment of which should have been made from the P13,000.00
received by Galan.
Due to the unauthorized disbursement by
respondents Tropical and Pons of the sum of P13,000.00 to Galan, petitioner
demanded that said amount be paid to him by respondents under the terms of the
written contract between the petitioner and respondent company.
ISSUE:
Whether there was a breach of trust when Tropical disbursed the money to Galan instead of Muñasque
HELD:
No, there was no breach of trust when Tropical disbursed
the money to Galan instead of Muñasque.
The Supreme Court held that there is nothing in the records to indicate that the partnership organized by the two men was not a genuine one. A falling out or misunderstanding between the partners does not convert the partnership into a sham organization.
In the case at bar the respondent Tropical had every reason
to believe that a partnership existed between the petitioner and Galan and no
fault or error can be imputed against it for making payments to "Galan and
Associates" and delivering the same to Galan because as far as it was
concerned, Galan was a true partner with real authority to transact on behalf
of the partnership with which it was dealing.
No comments:
Post a Comment